Buckingham, David (2011) The Material Child.


ARGUMENT

Buckingham rejects the traditional empowered verses exploited debate.  Children are not incompetent vulnerable consumers.  Nor do they express power and autonomy through consumption.  This book aims to re-frame how children’s consumption can be understood academically.

SUMMARY

Markets have not “invaded” childhood (the sacred v. the profane Cook 2004).  Buckingham suggests the dyadic (empowered vs. exploited) view oversimplifies the issue.  Instead he argues for a broader socio-cultural understanding of children’s consumer culture embedded in both social and market relationships.   Consumption is a site of both constraint AND choice, and control AND creativity.  Consumer culture both shapes and reflects social relationships and consumer choice.

But consumers are not all-powerful:

“commercial producers and marketers obviously set constraints and parameters, and provide and shape the resources that make consumption possible.  Social relationships construct and mediate consumer culture, yet consumer culture in turn shapes the nature and meaning of social relationships” (pg 3).

Chapter 1 – Campaigners vs. Marketers

 

Chapter 2 -Theories of Adult Consumption

 

Chapter 3 -Lit Review of Children’s Consumption

 

Chapters 4 & 5 – Continuities between historical and modern

 

 

METHOD

 

CRITIQUE

 

HOW TO USE

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s